The Inferiority Complex of the Muslim Ummah: A Critique of the Islamization of Knowledge in the Era of Globalization
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61455/sicopus.v3i01.289Keywords:
inferiority complex, islamization of science, globalization, western, dominationAbstract
Objective: The dominance of Western civilization in various aspects of life, including politics, economics, and science, has created conditions in which Muslims experience an inferiority complex in the face of modern science. To overcome this, Muslim intellectuals initiated the concept of the Islamization of science as an effort to build a scientific system based on Islamic values. However, this idea has been criticized by several Muslim thinkers who consider that the Islamization of science approach tends to be ideological rather than methodological, and has the potential to create a dichotomy between Islam and global science. Theoretical Framework: The theoretical framework used in this study combines social psychology theories about inferiority complexes and Islamic educational theories that emphasize the importance of building knowledge through Islamic teachings without losing relevance in the global world. Literature Review: The literature reviewed in this study includes various works that discuss the Islamization of knowledge, critiques of the dominance of Western culture, and issues related to globalization and its impact on Muslim identity. Methods: This study uses a qualitative approach with a discourse analysis method to critically examine the various perspectives that have developed regarding the Islamization of science. The data sources used come from literature studies, including the works of Muslim thinkers such as Syed Naquib al-Attas and Ismail Raji' al-Faruqi, as well as criticism from academics who highlight the limitations of this approach. Results: The results of the study show that although the Islamization of science attempts to restore the intellectual superiority of Muslims, this approach faces serious challenges, such as the lack of a transparent methodology, limited implementation in higher education, and the possibility of academic isolation from the global scientific community. Implications: Therefore, this study offers an alternative, more integrative approach, namely the reconstruction of the Islamic scientific paradigm that not only maintains Islamic values but can contribute to universal scientific discourse without getting caught up in the Islam vs West dichotomy. Novelty: This study presents a novel critique of the Islamization of knowledge by addressing the inferiority complex among Muslims in the face of Western scientific dominance. Unlike prior ideological approaches, it proposes a methodological reconstruction of the Islamic scientific paradigm that integrates Islamic values with global discourse, avoiding the Islam-versus-West dichotomy.
References
Q. Gui, C. Liu, and D. Du, “Globalization of science and international scientific collaboration: A network perspective,” Geoforum, vol. 105, pp. 1–12, 2019, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2019.06.017
B. T. Asheim, “Smart specialisation, innovation policy and regional innovation systems: what about new path development in less innovative regions?” Innov. Eur. J. Soc. Sci. Res., vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 8–25, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1080/13511610.2018.1491001
H. Dabashi, “Theology of Discontent,” in The Ideological Foundation of the Islamic Revolution in Iran, New York: Routledge, 2017. doi: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315135519
A. M. Ansari, Iran, Islam and Democracy: The Politics of Managing Change. Gingko Library, 2019.
E.-U. Petersmann, “Neo-liberal, state-capitalist and ordo-liberal conceptions of world trade: the rise and fall of the WTO dispute settlement system.,” China Yearb. Int. Relations, vol. 38, pp. 1–41, 2020, doi: https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004501638_002
H. V Milner, “Is Global Capitalism Compatible with Democracy? Inequality, Insecurity, and Interdependence,” Int. Stud. Q., vol. 65, no. 4, pp. 1097–1110, 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/isq/sqab056
Z. Kazmi, “Radical Islam in the Western Academy,” Rev. Int. Stud., vol. 48, no. 4, pp. 725–747, 2022, doi: DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210521000553
F. Feriyadi and S. Hadi, “Hassan Hanafiâ€TMs Response to Western Hegemony in Muqaddimah FÄ« ‘Ilmi al-IstighrÄb Through Hegemony Theory of Gramsci,” IJISH (International J. Islam. Stud. Humanit., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 47–56, 2018, doi: https://doi.org/10.26555/ijish.v1i1.133
S. M. N. Al-Attas, Islam dan Sekularisme. Bandung: Institut PIMPIN, 2011.
I. R. Al-Faruqi, Islamisasi Pengetahuan, terj. Anas Mahyudin. Bandung: Pustaka, 1984.
J. Arroisi, H. F. Zarkasyi, and W. Roini, “The Relevance of Contemporary Epistemology on Existing Knowledge: A Critical Analysis of Western Scientific Worldview according to al-Attas Perspective,” Afkar J. Akidah dan Pemikir. Islam, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 225–256, 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.22452/afkar.vol25no2.7
Khalina Mohammed Khalili, “Criticisms On Ontological Relativism Of Modern Science By Syed Muhammad Naquib Al-Attas And Seyyed Hossein Nasr,” Al-Shajarah J. Int. Inst. Islam. Thought Civilis., vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 127–152, 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.31436/shajarah.v29i1.1832
R. Khuza’i, I. Safrudin, and H. Suhendi, “The Thought of Isma’il Raji Al-Faruqi and Its Influence in Western and Islamic Civilization,” in Proceedings of the 2nd Social and Humaniora Research Symposium, 2020, pp. 575–579. doi: https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.200225.125
A. Ma’ruf, A. W. Kurniawan, M. I. Fatoni, S. Alam, and L. Hakim, “Can Al-Faruqi’s Islamization Deals with Islamic Economics? Revisiting Al-Faruqi’s Islamization of Economics,” Tsaqafah, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 405–428, 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.21111/tsaqafah.v19i2.9337
A. T. Kuru, Islam, Authoritarianism, and Underdevelopment: A Global and Historical Comparison. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2019.
P. Hoodbhoy, Islam and Science: Religious Orthodoxy and the Battle for Rationality. Bloomsbury Academic, 1991.
O. Bakar, Islamic Civilisation and The Modern World: Thematic Essays. Gadong: ubd Press, 2015.
K. Aljunied, “Osman Bakar And Epistemological Renewal In The Muslim World,” Al-Shajarah J. Int. Inst. Islam. Thought Civilis., vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 1–27, 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.31436/shajarah.v27i1.1388
A. Sabic-El-Rayess, “Epistemological shifts in knowledge and education in Islam: A new perspective on the emergence of radicalization amongst Muslims,” Int. J. Educ. Dev., vol. 73, p. 102148, 2020, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2019.102148
A. Sahin, “Critical Issues in Islamic Education Studies: Rethinking Islamic and Western Liberal Secular Values of Education,” Religions, vol. 9, no. 11. 2018. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/rel9110335
R. Rahmawati, R. Rosita, and M. Asbari, “The Role and Challenges of Islamic Religious Education in the Age of Globalization,” J. Inf. Syst. Manag., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 6–11, 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.4444/jisma.v1i1.2
P. Mandaville, “Globalization and the Politics of Religious Knowledge: Pluralizing Authority in the Muslim World,” Theory, Cult. Soc., vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 101–115, 2007, doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276407074998
C. Alkouatli, N. Memon, D. Chown, and Y. Sai, “Something more beautiful: educational and epistemic integrations beyond inequities in Muslim-minority contexts,” J. Multicult. Educ., vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 406–418, 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/JME-05-2022-0062
S. Arikunto, Prosedur: Penelitian Suatu Pendekatan Praktik. Jakarta: PT. Rineka Cipta, 2013.
Sugiyono, Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R&D. Bandung: CV. Alfabeta, 2018.
J. W. Creswell and J. D. Creswell, Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. California: Sage Publications, 2017.
P. Connolly, Approaches to the study of Religion. London: The Continuum International Publishing Group, 2006.
S. P. Cohen, The Future of Pakistan. Washington: Brookings Institution Press, 2011.
C. Wilson, “Philosophical and Scientific Empiricism and Rationalism in the Seventeenth and Eighteenth Centuries BT - What Does it Mean to be an Empiricist? Empiricisms in Eighteenth Century Sciences,” in What Does it Mean to be an Empiricist?, S. Bodenmann and A.-L. Rey, Eds., Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2018, pp. 123–138. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-69860-1_7
S. C. S. Komu, “Cartesian Method of Doubt: A Critique,” Int. J. Acad. Res. Business, Arts Sci., vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 107–123, 2019, doi: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3459832
A TOOL, no. October. 2024. doi: https://doi.org/10.14293/PR2199.001173.v1
I. R. Al-Faruqi, Islamisasi Ilmu-ilmu Sosial. Surabaya: Amar Press, 1991.
Kuntowijoyo, Islam Sebagai Ilmu, Epistemologi. Metodologi dan Etika. Yogyakarta: Teraju, 2004.
S. H. B. Adiwibowo, M. N. R. Maksum, and A. Mohammad, “Islamic Science Paradigm and Islamic Science Paradigm in the Format of Progressive Education,” in Proceedings of the International Conference on Islamic and Muhammadiyah Studies (ICIMS 2023), Atlantis Press, 2023, pp. 562–576. doi: https://doi.org/10.2991/978-2-38476-102-9_50
U. Fathuddin, Perlukan Islamisasi Ilmu?, dalam Gagasan dan Perdebatan Islamisasi Ilmu Pengetahuan. Jakarta: Cidesindo, (Lembaga Studi Agama Dan Filsafat (Lsaf), Institute For Religious And Institutional Studies (Iris) dan International Institute of Islamic Thought Indonesia (IIITI), 2000.
Fazlurrahman, Islamisasi Ilmu; Sebuah Respons?, dalam Gagasan dan Perdebatan Islamisasi Ilmu Pengetahuan. Jakarta: Cidesindo, (Lembaga Studi Agama Dan Filsafat (Lsaf), Institute For Religious And Institutional Studies (Iris) Dan International Institute Of Islamic Thought Indonesia (Iiiti), 2000.
